This century's housing creation in Portland, Oregon · 2000 to 2026

How a city funds housing creation

Housing production is a flow; thus, ratios and rates are the measures.

Homes are net new homes in completed projects, counted in the year the project was finished. Population: U.S. Census (2000, 2010, 2020) and the Portland State University estimate for 2025. Households: Census 2000 and 2010, and a 2026 private estimate (Esri). A check on the count: the Census reports 28,201 more housing units in Portland in 2010 than in 2000; whereas this dataset finds net new homes completed over the same years. The reason for the discrepancy is unknown; but affirms the scale and directionality implied by this data, which is through .

Funding new homes

New homes are funded by different sources of money. The size of a project is one way to understand this.

75homes per project. (Move the slider to reflect your definition; every chart on this page follows it.)
New homes each year, by source of capital
Each source's share of new homes, year by year
Share of homes permitted, by year permit issued

Housing production is now mostly subsidized

Institutional-scale projects are funded either by private investors or by public subsidy. Splitting them shows market rate investment forces historically power housing production.

By year the first building permit was issued. Lighter bars are a projection.

Subsidized means a project receiving state, local bond or federal tax-credit money, or university housing. A market-rate project that includes required inclusionary units is counted as market rate because it is just a tax on higher income renters. Tags for the largest and most recent projects were checked one by one; older and smaller projects rely on matching to public affordable-housing records.

Where new homes are built is always changing

Each dot is a project, sized by its number of homes and colored by its source of capital. Move through the years to see which parts of the city each source favoured, and when it left. (Who builds the 'burbs, in the core, proximate to transit, etc.)

2017

National recessions reset housing production flows

The city's two "gate-keeping" systems - land use & building permit approvals - shrink the total time possible for larger buildings to gain approvals and be funded/built; slower approvals translate to smaller housing production flows.

Homes approved in design and historic reviews, and how many went on to a building permit
By year of land use decision. Shaded: the financial crisis, COVID, and the rise in inflation / rates.

Cases for 2010 to mid-2020 were transcribed by hand from city records; later cases were read from the written decisions. Cases before 2010 were read by script from the city's short case descriptions and are provisional. A case is linked to a building permit when the decision names the permit or when a permit of similar size was filed on the same site; some real links are missed, so the share lost is an upper estimate. Approvals from the last three years may still proceed.

Getting to a permit takes about three times as long as in 2000

Months to reach a building permit
Median, by year. Shaded: the same three downturns.

Why the city overstates housing production

The city's permit system carries a "new units" figure on each permit, but adding that column up counts homes that were never added. These are the ways it happens, with the number found in the record for 2000 to 2026.

What the record showsWhat actually happenedRecordsUnits or lots
Demolish and replaceA home is torn down and new housing built on the same site. Only the difference is new.3,693 projects4,604
Remodel recorded as a new unitA kitchen addition or bathroom remodel carries a new-unit figure, though no home is added.576 permits1,565
Hotel rooms recorded as unitsNew hotels and motels carry a new-unit figure.15 permits1,057
Middle housing land divisionsA land use approval splits an already-permitted fourplex or cottage cluster onto separate lots. The lots are not additional homes.237 cases since 20201,026
Permits that expiredUnits on permits that were never built remain in the record.428 permits558
Whole project counted on every permitEach townhouse permit in a nine-home project shows nine units.42 permits206
Replacement or relocated homesReplacement manufactured homes, moved houses and fire rebuilds.137 permits157

About this data

Sources

The city has two gatekeeping functions that bottleneck / control housing production flows - land use approvals and building permit approvals. All counts are pulled from the city's official land use decisions - via City Auditor's Efiles archives. For building permit approvals, the City of Portland's public permit records are used via PortlandMaps. Distinction between market rate versus public/subsidized housing production comes from subsidy records of the Oregon Affordable Housing Inventory, Metro's Regulated Affordable Housing Inventory, the Portland Housing Bureau and Oregon Housing and Community Services - cross referenced to the specific building permit for each project. Every project counted here can be reviewed in the project list.

What counts as a new home

New construction, conversions of offices and hotels into housing, and homes added inside existing buildings such as accessory dwelling units. Remodels, hotels and replacements do not count. Demos that removed a home to build a new home in its place do not count as adding housing.

Projects

Because townhouses and subdivisions are approved as one project, but each home holds its own building permit, a 40 meters proximity and 270 days relationship was used to distinguish a discrete development. For example, a 14-home townhouse project counts once, at its real size (instead of as 14 specific, one unit development efforts.)

Sources of capital

Projects of 1 to 4 homes are typically funded from households with sufficient wealth to do so. Smaller development projects - from 5 homes up to the institutional thresholds - are typically funded by local and regional developers and investor groups. Larger projects at or above the minimum investment scale thresholds, be they rental or for sale, are those funded by institutional investment (or via public capital (i.e. city taxes, regional bond measures, federal low income housing tax credits, etc.))

Projection

The lighter bars for 2027 and 2028 count only projects already filed and awaiting a permit. They assume household-funded building continues at its recent pace, that between a quarter and 60% of pending mid-sized homes actually manifest into permitted new housing production, that most pending subsidized large projects proceed (60% to 90%), and that few pending market-rate large projects do (none to 25%). Projects not yet filed are not included.

Limits

Affordable-housing inventories lag by one to three years. Grouping by distance can occasionally join deals or split phases. Of about 17,000 projects, around 550 were reviewed individually; the rest follow the rules above. The characterization of all flows should be understood to be accurate, with reasonable precision and project-level verifications to ensure reliance.

About this housing data visualization project

Envision Portland Trends began in the summer of 2020 as an applied study of housing production, city governance and statistics / computer science realms. The effort was funded by Old i, LLC via federal COVID PPP stimulus to create socially helpful learning for Williams College students that also can enable better civic decision making.